Clark v. Dave et al
| Wasim Lamont Clark |
| Chaplain Dave and Chaplain Laura |
| 3:2023cv50024 |
| January 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Lisa A Jensen |
| Iain D Johnston |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER; The Court has received Plaintiff's motion to dismiss this case #5 , which it interprets as a notice of voluntary dismissal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) allows a plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order by filing "a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment." The effect of such a notice is a dismissal without prejudice effective upon filing. See Smith v. Potter, 513 F.3d 781, 78283 (7th Cir. 2008); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(B). Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate all pending motions, close this case, and send Plaintiff a copy of this order. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Iain D. Johnston on 2/27/2023: Mailed notice (yxp, )
|
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Wasim Lamont Clark to dismiss case (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(pg, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER, Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff is directed to either: (1) submit a renewed, properly completed application that reflects his income prior to his incarceration and contains the information specified in this order; or (2) pre-pay the $402.00 filing fee. Failure to comply with this order by March 17, 2023, will result in summary dismissal of this case. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of this order and a blank in forma pauperis application (prisoner version). The Court defers consideration of Plaintiff's complaint pending compliance with this order. See the attached Order for details. Signed by the Honorable Iain D. Johnston on 2/14/2023: Mailed notice (yxp, )
|
| MAILED Copy of order #4 and IFP form to Plaintiff (yxp, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Wasim Lamont Clark for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jp, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jp, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED COMPLAINT by Wasim Lamont Clark. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jp, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Iain D. Johnston and Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jp, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jp, ) |
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Wasim L. Clark. (jp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
