The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois v. Montefusco Heating & Sheet Metal
| The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois |
| Montefusco Heating & Sheet Metal |
| 3:2023cv50121 |
| April 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Iain D Johnston |
| Margaret J Schneider |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: The plaintiff has filed a notice of voluntary dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Dkt. 3. The defendant has not answered or moved for summary judgment, or even appeared. Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (jp, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois (Haggestad, Troy) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois by Troy E. Haggestad (Haggestad, Troy) |
| MAILED Local Rule 83.16 to counsel for plaintiff. (jp, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Montefusco Heating & Sheet Metal (sxh, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20534055. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Haggestad, Troy) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Iain D. Johnston and Honorable Margaret J. Schneider. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Margaret J. Schneider. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pg, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (pg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois v. Montefusco Heating & Sheet Metal | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois | |
| Represented By: | Troy E. Haggestad |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Montefusco Heating & Sheet Metal | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
