Hoskins v. Thielen et al
Joshua Hoskins |
Dallas Thielen, Mr. Julius, Mr. Dalke, Mr. Ditzler, Mr. Knudson, Mr. Witt and Ali Hensen |
3:2023cv50178 |
May 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Iain D Johnston |
Margaret J Schneider |
Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 Notice Of Compliance by Hoskins (pg, ) |
Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: Plaintiff's motion to advise #12 is denied. The docket reflects that USM-285 forms were sent to Plaintiff. Plaintiff must allow sufficient time for the Court to mail the forms and for their distribution once received at Dixon Correctional Center. Plaintiff's motion to waive filing fee showing cause #13 is denied. The Court is aware that Plaintiff owes multiple filing fees in this Court as well as other courts and that 100% of his funds should be automatically deducted for such fees. As such, the Court acknowledges that filing fees for this case may not start to be deducted in the immediate future. However, Plaintiff remains responsible for all fees and if he receives any funds those funds must be paid toward his filing fees. Mailed notice (yxp, ) |
Filing 13 MOTION by Plaintiff Joshua Hoskins To Advise (pg, ) |
Filing 12 MOTION by Plaintiff Joshua HoskinsTo Waive Filing Fee Showing Cause (pg, ) |
Filing 11 COMPLAINT filed by Joshua Hoskins; (yxp, ) |
MAILED Order #10, complaint, issued summonses to US Marshal via email. Mailed #10 to Fiscal Dept and Trust Fund Officer. Mailed Copy of order #10 and 7 USM-285 forms to Plaintiff. (yxp, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Dalke, Ditzler, Ali Hensen, Julius, Knudson, Dallas Thielen, Witt (yxp, ) |
|
Filing 9 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Joshua Hoskins for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (pg, ) |
Filing 8 Notice To The Court To In Forma Pauperis Application by Joshua Hoskins (pg, ) |
Filing 7 MOTION by Plaintiff Joshua Hoskins Notice To The Court (pg, ) |
|
Filing 5 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Joshua Hoskins for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (pg, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Joshua Hoskins For Relief (pg, ) |
MAILED Copy of order #6 and IFP form to Plaintiff. (yxp, ) |
MAILED Copy of order #3 and IFP form to Plaintiff. (yxp, ) |
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Iain D. Johnston and Honorable Margaret J. Schneider. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Margaret J. Schneider. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (jp, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jp, ) |
MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Joshua Hoskins. (jp, ) |
Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jp, ) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED COMPLAINT by Joshua Hoskins. (jp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.