Farner v. Redden et al
| Joshua S Farner |
| Redden, Eggerly, Lt. Boyd, Patricia Corrigan, C/O McCoy, John Doe, C/O B. Samples, Sgt. Bounds, Sgt. Jacobson, Sgt. Moore, Megan Williams and C/O Atchley |
| 3:2023cv50311 |
| August 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Lisa A Jensen |
| Iain D Johnston |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Joshua S Farner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (jp, ) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Plaintiff Joshua S Farner to Reconsider (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jp, ) |
Filing 8
ORDER : The Court denies Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 for the reasons discussed below. Plaintiff must either (1) pay the full statutory filing fee of $402.00 or (2) submit a renewed application to proceed in forma pauperis that complies with the instructions in the Statement section below. Failure to fully comply by October 31, 2023, will result in summary dismissal of this case. The Court defers consideration of Plaintiff's complaint and motion for attorney representation until after his fee status has been resolved. The Court denies Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order #4 and motions for preliminary injunction #5 #6 because they do not comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis along with a copy of this order. [See STATEMENT] Signed by the Honorable Iain D. Johnston on 9/29/2023. Mailed notice (jp, )
|
| MAILED copy of order dated 9/29/2023 and a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis to Joshua S. Farner. (jp, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION by Plaintiff Joshua S Farner for attorney representation (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(pg, ) |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Plaintiff Joshua S Farner for preliminary injunction (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(pg, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Joshua S Farner for preliminary injunction (pg, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Joshua S Farner for temporary restraining order (pg, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Joshua S Farner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (pg, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (pg, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 0 copies by Joshua S Farner (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(pg, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (pg, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Iain D. Johnston and Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Lisa Jensen. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pg, ) |
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Joshua S Farner. (jp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
