Lee v. Williams et al
Plaintiff: Montez Lee
Defendant: Tarry Williams and Andrea Tack
Case Number: 3:2023cv50350
Filed: September 26, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Lisa A Jensen
Referring Judge: Iain D Johnston
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER, Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is denied. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this case, he must pay the statutory $402 filing fee. The deadline to pay the $402 filing fee is November 17, 2023. The Court defers its ruling on Plaintiff's motions for attorney assistance until Plaintiff has satisfied the filing fee. See the attached order for details. Signed by the Honorable Iain D. Johnston on 10/25/2023: Mailed notice (yxp, )
September 27, 2023 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jp, )
September 27, 2023 MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Montez Lee. (jp, )
September 27, 2023 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Iain D. Johnston and Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jp, )
September 26, 2023 Filing 5 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Montez Lee. (jp, )
September 26, 2023 Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Montez Lee for attorney representation. (jp, )
September 26, 2023 Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Montez Lee for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (jp, )
September 26, 2023 Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jp, )
September 26, 2023 Filing 1 RECEIVED COMPLAINT by Montez Lee; Jury Demand. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (jp, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lee v. Williams et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Montez Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tarry Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrea Tack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?