Myers v. Lammer
| Nathaniel Myers |
| B. Lammer |
| 3:2024cv50415 |
| October 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Rebecca R Pallmeyer |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: This case is dismissed as a duplication of Myers v. Lammer, No. 24 C 50408 (N.D. Ill.) (Pallmeyer, J.). Petitioner is advised that he should proceed with his claims in the No. 24 C 50408 case. Petitioner remains liable for the five dollar filing fee in this case. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is denied because Petitioner is able to pay the filing fee. Petitioner shall pay the filing fee by November 18, 2024. Failure to do so may impact his ability to proceed with future litigation in this District. Any pending motions are moot. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 10/11/2024. Mailed notice. (cp, )
|
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: The Clerk is directed to set aside the initial general reference, pursuant to IOP 11(d)(1), to a magistrate judge in all Western Division cases assigned to Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer. A magistrate judge is to be designated on the docket. Parties are, however, encouraged to consent to proceed before the magistrate judge for all purposes or for limited purposes pursuant to our Local Rule 73.1(a), (g). The Clerk shall docket this order at the time of the case assignment or reassignment. Mailed notice (jp, ) |
| Filing 4 RECEIVED from Illinois Central; Case Number 4:24-cv-04182 |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Margaret J. Schneider. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (jp, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER entered by Sr. District Judge James E. Shadid on 10/9/2024. This case is sua sponte TRANSFERRED in the interests of justice to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. SEE WRITTEN ORDER. (JPL) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/10/2024.]
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Nathaniel Myers. Responses due by 10/21/2024 (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DW) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/10/2024.] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Nathaniel Myers. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Envelope)(DW) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/10/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Myers v. Lammer | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: B. Lammer | |
| Represented By: | W. Scott Simpson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Nathaniel Myers | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
