Burton v. Hoffman et al
| Marcus R Burton, Sr. |
| Mr. Powers, Tristan Shaw, Jonathan Piper, Mrs. Ackert, Mr. Potter, Arthur Manzano, Ms. Perez, Mr.. Conley, Chelsa Sword, Mr. Sproles, Monica Carpenter, Laura L Emmole, Latoya Hughes, Dr. Larry Sy, Illinois Department of Corrections, Jonathan Frederick, Susan Tuell, Megan Skryzpinski, Mitch Wakeley, Andrea Tack, Dylan Schopp, Christopher Wheeler, Ms. S. Jackson, Danielle Hoffman, Joseph Bonnell, Ms. Forbes, Mrs. Grossman, Haley DeCrane, Mrs. Deneve, Amy Watson, Jon Loftus, Whitney Wilson and Wexford Healthcare Sources Inc |
| 3:2024cv50488 |
| December 3, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Rebecca R Pallmeyer |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is granted. The court orders the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration to immediately deduct $23.51 from Plaintiff's account for payment to the Clerk of Court as an initial partial payment of the filing fee and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The court dismisses Plaintiff's complaint #1 without prejudice for misjoinder of claims, but gives him permission to amend his pleading. If Plaintiff fails to submit a proposed amended complaint that complies with this order by March 3, 2025, the court will dismiss this lawsuit. Plaintiff is reminded that he must promptly submit a change-of-address notification if he is released or transferred to another facility while this case is open. If he fails to comply, this case will be subject to dismissal with no further warning. Plaintiff's motions for attorney representation #4 and for service of process at government expense #5 are denied without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of this order and a blank amended complaint form. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 1/29/2025:Docketing mailed Notice (pg, )
|
| MAILED Blank Amended Complaint Form, Copy Of 1/29/25 Order to Marcus Burton (pg, ) |
| Filing 8 ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to #Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates)#, any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this #LINK# will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/27/2024: Mailed notice. (tg, ) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer : The Clerk is directed to set aside the initial general reference, pursuant to IOP 11(d)(1), to a magistrate judge in all Western Division cases assigned to Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer. A magistrate judge is to be designated on the docket. Parties are, however, encouraged to consent to proceed before the magistrate judge for all purposes or for limited purposes pursuant to our Local Rule 73.1(a), (g). The Clerk shall docket this order at the time of the case assignment. Mailed notice (jp, ) |
| Filing 6 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Marcus R Burton, Sr. (jp, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Marcus R Burton, SrFor Service of Process at Government Expense. (jp, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Marcus R Burton, Sr for attorney representation. (jp, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Marcus R Burton, Sr for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (jp, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jp, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED COMPLAINT by Marcus R Burton, Sr; Jury Demand. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibits, #3 Blank 285) (jp, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Margaret J. Schneider. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jp, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jp, ) |
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Marcus R Burton, Sr. (jp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
