Stroup v. Thomas
| James Frederic Stroup |
| Warden N. Thomas |
| Service List |
| 3:2026cv50280 |
| July 2, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Rebecca R Pallmeyer |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: The Clerk is directed to set aside the initial general reference, pursuant to IOP 11(d)(1), to a magistrate judge in all Western Division cases assigned to Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer. A magistrate judge is to be designated on the docket. Parties are, however, encouraged to consent to proceed before the magistrate judge for all purposes or for limited purposes pursuant to our Local Rule 73.1(a), (g). The Clerk shall docket this order at the time of the case assignment.Electronic notice (pg, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (pg, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by James Frederic Stroup against N. Thomas Received By Mail On 7/2/26 (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(pg, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to The Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Michael F. Iasparro. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.