Olive v. Snyder, et al
| 3:2002cv00945 |
| July 26, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| William D. Stiehl |
| Donald G. Wilkerson |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Anderson, Unknown Party, Anthony Olive, B Bravo, Captain Oakley, Cpt Lashbrook, Deputy Director Cooper, Donald N Snyder, Jr, Dwayne Clark, Eugene McAdory, Gary A Knop, Klint Gale, Leora Harry, Michael Baker, Minh T Scott, Officer Meyerhoff, Officer Phoenix, Robert E Gales, Roger D Cowan, Sandra Kibby Brown, Superintendent Maue, Tom Caraway, Tom Carter against Anthony Olive. Approved by Judge William D. Stiehl on 3/23/09. (skp)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER denying without prejudice 70 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 71 Motion to Compel; and denying 84 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 2/18/2009. (hbs)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER denying 87 Motion for Reconsideration; denying 89 Motion for Issuance; denying 89 Motion to Substitute Party. Signed by Judge William D. Stiehl on 02/17/09. (jkb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Olive v. Snyder, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
