Freeman v. West et al
| 3:2005cv00036 |
| January 19, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| J. Phil Gilbert |
| Clifford J. Proud |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE in favor of Illinois Department of Corrections, Randolph County, Douglas A Cravens, Eugene McAdory, Geoffrey W Freeman, James R Cheatham, R Blagojevich, Roger W Walker, Sgt Henry, Stephen D Mote against Geoffrey W Freeman. Defendants Mary West and James Bauersachs are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud on 1/27/10. (amv)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER re 96 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by James Bauersachs, Mary West. Case is dismissed. Judgment shall enter accordingly. Signed by Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud on 1/26/10. (amv)
|
|
Filing
78
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, Denying 75 MOTION for Order to filed by Geoffrey W Freeman. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 8/24/09. (bkl)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER granting 53 Motion to Strike ; Striking 52 Traverse ; denying 54 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud on 2/12/09. (amv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Freeman v. West et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
