Ambrosia Land Investments, LLC et al v. Heritage Coal Company, LLC
| 3:2005cv00371 |
| May 24, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Other Statutory Actions Office |
| David R Herndon |
| Clifford J. Proud |
| Defendant |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
107
CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Illinois Mine Subsidence Insurance Fund against Heritage Coal Company, LLC in the amount of $350,000 plus interest. Approved by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 6/10/09. (See Judgment for specifics)(skp)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER GRANTING 89 Intervening Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and DENYING 91 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 06/10/2009. (seg)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER ACKNOWLEDGING 101 Stipulation of Dismissal. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Intervening Plaintiff's claims against Defendant still remain. Signed by Chief Judge David R Herndon on 11/26/2008. (seg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ambrosia Land Investments, LLC et al v. Heritage Coal Company, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
