People of the United States of America v. Nayak
| 3:2006cv00662 |
| August 25, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| J. Phil Gilbert |
| Clifford J. Proud |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
CLERK'S JUDGMENT (JF/dka) in favor of P.D.L. Nayak against People of the United States of America, United States of America, Pam Tucker. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 6/15/09. (dka, )
|
|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 3/3/09. (bkl)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 63 Motion to Strike 62 Response in Opposition to Motion. The Clerk of Court shall strike and seal Response (doc. 62). Tucker shall file response with all redactions by 3/10/09. Tucker shall show cause why she should not be held in contempt of Court for violating the Court's limited Protective Order by 3/10/09. Signed by Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud on 2/27/09. (amv)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER granting 55 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud on 1/9/09. (amv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: People of the United States of America v. Nayak | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
