Abbott et al v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
Case Number: 3:2006cv00701
Filed: September 11, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Reagan
Presiding Judge: Donald G. Wilkerson
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 525 ORDER granting 501 Motion for Attorney Fees. See attached for details. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 7/17/2015. (jls)
December 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 482 ORDER denying 469 Motion to Strike. See attached for details. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 12/14/2014. (jls)
December 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 481 ORDER. For the reasons explained herein, the motions at Docket Nos. 472 and 474 are DENIED. See attached for details. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 12/11/2014. (jls)
November 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 458 MEMORANDUM & ORDER. For the reasons explained herein, Judge Wilkerson's Discovery Order (Doc. 444 ) is affirmed in all respects, and Plaintiffs' Appeal of Magistrate Decision (Doc. 446 ) is DENIED. See attached for details. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 11/21/2014. (jls)
September 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 367 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 343 Motion to Certify Class: Plaintiffs' motion for class certification of the Excessive Fees Class and the CSF Subclass 2 is GRANTED; Plaintiffs' motion for class certification of the SVF Class and the CSF Subclass 1 is DENIED. The Court APPOINTS the firm of Schlichter, Bogard & Denton, LLP, as Class Counsel for the Plaintiff Classes pursuant to Rule 23(g).. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 9/24/12. (caa)
February 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 283 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER finding that Plaintiffs cannot maintain a direct action for Plan-wide recovery and pursue the company stock fund claims in their amended complaint regardless of the Court's denial of class certification. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 2/10/10. (caa)
July 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 262 ORDER denying 250 Motion to Strike Designation of Class Counsel. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 7/22/09. (caa)
July 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 258 ORDER dismissing 243 Appeal of Magistrate Judge's Decision to District Court and affirming Magistrate Judge Wilkerson's Orders (Docs. 228, 232). Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 7/8/09. (caa)
April 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 239 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 160 Second Motion to Certify Class. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 4/3/09. (caa)
March 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 228 ORDER granting 200 Motion to Compel; granting 208 Sealed Motion to Compel; denying 210 Motion to Strike; granting in part and denying in part 211 Motion to Seal Document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 3/31/2009. (hbs)
February 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 188 ORDER denying 120 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 2/27/2009. (hbs)
December 12, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 141 ORDER denying 117 Motion to Vacate Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 12/12/2008. (hbs)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Abbott et al v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?