Altman v. Department of Children and Family Services et al
| 3:2006cv00771 |
| October 10, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| William D. Stiehl |
| Donald G. Wilkerson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
141
ORDER granting 137 Motion for Directed Verdict. Signed by Judge William D. Stiehl on 02/10/10. (jkb)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER granting 46 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 48 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 52 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 77 Motion to Strike ; denying 80 Motion to Strike ; denying as moot 81 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; denying 101 Counter Motion for Collateral Estoppel.. Signed by Judge William D. Stiehl on 09/28/09. (dkd )
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 64 MOTION for Leave to File Response to Defendants' MSJ filed by Pamela Altman. (See Order for specifics. Any Supplements due by 9/19/2008.) Signed by Judge William D. Stiehl on 9/16/08. (skp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Altman v. Department of Children and Family Services et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
