Yarber v. Metha et al
| 3:2006cv01018 |
| December 12, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Philip M. Frazier |
| J. Phil Gilbert |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
124
CLERK'S JUDGMENT (NJR/dka): Count I (wrongful death) in favor of Harrisburg Family Practice, Ltd., Vinay K. Metha and against Melissa Yarber; Count II (survival action) in favor of Melissa Yarber against Harrisburg Family Practice, Ltd., Vinay K . Metha in the total amount of $600,000.00; Count III (wrongful deaht), Count IV (survival action), Count V (wrongful death) and Count VI (survival action) are dismissed without prejudice and without costs.Approved by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 10/6/09. (dka, )
|
|
Filing
85
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, Granting 67 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Harrisburg Family Practice, Ltd., Vinay K. Metha. Court directs Clerk of Court to enter judgment on Count I in favor of those defendants at the close of the case. Only Count II against Dr. Mehta and Primary Care remains for trial. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 2/13/09. (bkl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Yarber v. Metha et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
