Kelly v. Null et al
| Richard B Kelly |
| Jacob D Null and J Sisk |
| 3:2007cv00339 |
| May 4, 2007 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Alexander |
| William D. Stiehl |
| Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
ORDER GRANTING 105 MOTION for transcript. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 5/5/2010. (ssd)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER GRANTING 101 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis filed by Richard B. Kelly. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 2/1/2010. (ssd)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER: Plaintiff Richard B. Kelly is barred from filing any new papers in this Court until such time as he shall pay to the Clerk of Court a monetary penalty in the amount of $200; see order for specifics. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 11/23/2009. (jhs)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER granting 40 Motion to Quash; denying 42 Motion to Strike ; denying 45 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud on 8/10/09. (amv)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER granting 37 Motion for Subpoenas; granting 39 Motion to Compel. The Clerk of Court shall send plaintiff five blank subpoenas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud on 6/17/09. (amv)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER denying 13 Motion to Stay Further Proceedings until Order is Obeyed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud on 2/3/09. (amv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
