Hairston v. McCain et al
| Shauntez T Hairston |
| Kenneth McCain, Muddasani Reddy, Thomas Knapp, Phil McLaurin, Annette Tim and Mearl Justus |
| 3:2007cv00687 |
| October 1, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| St. Clair |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Donald G. Wilkerson |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
ORDER denying without prejudice 53 Motion to Compel, 57 Motion for Appointment of Stenographer/Court Reporter, and, 58 Motion to Compel; denying as moot 61 Motion to Amend/Correct and 64 Motion to Amend/Correct; and denying without prejudice 65 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 10/13/2009. (hbs)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER regarding Plaintiff's correspondence with the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 7/23/2009. (hbs)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER denying as moot 44 Motion to Compel Answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 5/21/2009. (hbs)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER denying denying 21 Motion for Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff; 35 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 4/27/2009. (hbs)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 2/27/09. (eed)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
