Buechel v. United States of America et al
Plaintiff: Joseph W Buechel
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 3:2008cv00132
Filed: February 25, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: J. Phil Gilbert
Presiding Judge: Clifford J. Proud
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 175 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER the Court SUSTAINS Buechels objection (Doc. 166) and DECLINES to tax costs in this case. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 6/17/2013. (jdh)
May 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 162 CLERK'S JUDGMENT (NJR/jdh)IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered on Count 1 (Federal Tort Claims Act for negligence based on the conditions leading to the possible transmission of a staphylococcus infection in the laundry fa cility) in favor of defendant United States of America and against plaintiff Joseph W. Buechel; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Count 2 (Federal Tort Claims Act for medical malpractice) is dismissed with prejudice.Approved by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 5/13/2013. (jdh)
August 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 135 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Denying 127 MOTION to Exclude Plaintiff's Expert and Strike His Report filed by United States of America. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 8/2/12. (bkl)
March 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 130 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court AFFIRMS Magistrate Judge Fraziers order Doc. 115 granting Buechels motion to strike Doc. 93 and OVERRULES the United States objection to that order Doc. 123 . The Court ADOPTS M agistrate Judge Fraziers Report Doc. 116 in its entirety as supplemented by this order and OVERRULES the United States objection Doc. 120 . The Court DENIES the United States motion for summary judgment Doc. 90 ; and DENIES the United States motion for leave to amend its answer Doc. 124 . Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 3/20/2012. (jdh)
November 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER granting 86 Motion To Extend The Privacy Act/Protective Order And Permit Discovery by Joseph W Buechel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud on 11/30/10. (amv)
October 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER denying 80 Motion To Conduct Expert Discovery In Accordance With Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4)(B) And (C). Signed by Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud on 10/22/10. (amv)
September 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER granting in full 69 Motion to Compel. Defendant shall produce the aforementioned documents on or before 9/17/10. Signed by Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud on 9/7/10. (amv)
August 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER regarding 69 Motion to Compel Privacy Act. Signed by Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud on 8/18/10. (amv)
March 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 57 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 54 ; dismissing 33 Motion to Dismiss filed by United States of America. The Court dismisses Count 2 of Buechel's medical malpractice with prejudice. Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly at close of case. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 3/11/2010. (dka, )
October 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 44 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER striking 43 MOTION Requesting the Facilitation of the Following Action filed by Joseph W Buechel. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 10/8/09. (dka, )
September 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 42 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER vacating Magistrate Judge Proud's order 29 ; appointing Attorney J. Kevin McCall for Joseph W Buechel. Bruchel's 38 APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court and documents 39 and 41 are rendered moot by this order. Buechel's 40 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis is moot in light of Court of Appeals' order dismissing appeal. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 9/22/09. (dka, )
August 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER directing Clerk of Court to docket Buchel's July 31, 2009 filing 34 as an Appeal from Magistrate Judge's Order. Clerk to send copy of this Order to USCA 7. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 8/13/09. (dka, )
July 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION granting in part and denying in part 12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by United States of America. Motion is granted to the extent it seeks to dismiss Count 2. Court dismissses Count 2 without prejudice. The motion is denied to the extent it seeks to dismiss Count 1. Plaintiff ordered to file an Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 7/21/09. (dka, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Buechel v. United States of America et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph W Buechel
Represented By: Nicole A. Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By: J. Christopher Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?