Hairston v. Knapp et al
| Shauntez Hairston |
| Thomas Knapp, Mearl Justus, Mel Weith and St. Clair County Sheriff's Department |
| 3:2008cv00303 |
| April 22, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| St. Clair |
| G. Patrick Murphy |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
230
ORDER denying 227 Motion to Copy; denying 227 Motion for trial and hearing transcripts. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 12/1/2010. (hbs)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER DENYING 14 , 33 , 36 , 44 , 45 , 58 , 62 , 64 , 69 MOTIONS to Appoint Counsel and for Hearing thereon filed by Shauntez Hairston; DENYING 33 , 39 , 52 MOTIONS to Clarify and for Sanctions filed by Shauntez Hairston; GRANTING in pa rt and DENYING in part 80 MOTION to Clarify filed by Shauntez Hairston, such that the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to REFILE the second amended complaint in its entirety; DENYING 59 , 60 , 63 , 65 , 66 MOTIONS to Substitute Party filed by Shaun tez Hairston, and DISMISSING claims against Brenda J. Cole; GRANTING in part 35 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer Plaintiff's Interrogatories filed by Joseph Steinhauer and Mearl Justus and granting Defendants Steinhauer and Justus until 4/2/2010, to answer interrogatories served in this case; DENYING 75 Motion to Strike and DENYING 75 MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Steven Saunders and Regina Elaine Ray; CONSTRUING 41 MOTION to Demand a Bench Trial in the Instant C ause filed by Shauntez Hairston as WITHDRAWAL of jury demand and maintaining jury trial setting because of 27 jury demand filed by Defendants Knapp, Steinhauer, and Justus; OVERRULING 61 APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court by Sh auntez Hairston; DENYING 70 MOTION to Compel filed by Shauntez Hairston; DENYING 79 MOTION for Default Judgment filed by Shauntez Hairston; DENYING 71 MOTION for Discovery Hearing filed by Shauntez Hairston; GRANTING in part 72 MOTION to Comp el filed by Shauntez Hairston, such that Defendant Weith is DIRECTED to file a Status Report on or before 4/2/2010, to advise the Court of the status of Hairston's production requests; DENYING 77 MOTION for Appointment of Non-Party to Administ er Oaths to Deponents filed by Shauntez Hairston; DENYING 78 MOTION to Amend/Correct 13 Amended Complaint filed by Shauntez Hairston. This order clears all extant motions, and additional frivolous motions will result in a hard injunction enjoining further filings by Hairston. Defendant Brenda J. Cole terminated; action due by 4/2/2010; Status Report due by 4/2/2010. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 3/23/2010. (ssd)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER DIRECTING Clerk to prepare waiver of service packets for and DIRECTING the United States Marshal to serve process upon Defendants Ray, Saunders, and White. FINDING AS MOOT 19 MOTION to Compel, 32 MOTION to Compel, 34 MOTION for Court to Serve Defendants, 40 MOTION For Court to Render Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff, and 47 MOTION for Judgment Against Defendants filed by Shauntez Hairston. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 12/29/2009. (hbs)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson; dismissing St. Clair County Sheriff's Department. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 3/30/09. (eed)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
