Green et al v. Goodyear - Dunlop Tires North America
| Darla Green and Michael Green |
| Goodyear - Dunlop Tires North America |
| Michael Green |
| Goodyear - Dunlop Tires North America |
| 3:2008cv00472 |
| July 1, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| O Office |
| Madison |
| Philip M. Frazier |
| G. Patrick Murphy |
| None |
| O |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
146
ORDER granting 112 Sealed Motion by Plaintiff Darla Green to strike errata sheet changes to the deposition transcript of Ian Willetts, a corporate representative of Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Goodyear Dunlop Tires North America, Ltd. ("Goodyear"). Goodyear's errata sheet changes to Mr. Willetts's deposition transcript are stricken and Mr. Willetts is barred from testifying in this case as a witness for Goodyear. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 3/9/2010. (jhs)
|
|
Filing
143
ORDER granting 94 Motion in Limine to Exclude Unsupported Expert Testimony with No Foundation brought by Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Goodyear Dunlop Tires North America, Ltd. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 3/5/2010. (jhs)
|
|
Filing
135
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 96 Motion in Limine brought by Plaintiff Darla Green; see order for specifics. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 3/2/2010. (jhs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
