Dinwiddie v. Evans
Petitioner: Steve Dinwiddie
Respondent: John Evans
Case Number: 3:2008cv00689
Filed: October 1, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: G. Patrick Murphy
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER DISMISSING CASE for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 06/30/09. (njr)
March 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson; granting 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 3/19/09. (eed)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dinwiddie v. Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Steve Dinwiddie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?