Sydner v. Burns et al
| Earl E Sydner, Jr |
| Robert Burns, Deputy Marks, Deputy Sergeant Vaughn and Unknown Party |
| 3:2008cv00737 |
| October 20, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Livingston |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
119
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE in favor of Unknown Party, Charlie Glidewell, Deputy Sergeant Vaughn, George Schaefer, Greg Rowald, Michael Marks, Robert Burns against Earl E Sydner, Jr. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 7/16/12. (amv)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER granting 78 Motion in Limine; granting 104 Motion in Limine. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 6/14/12. (amv)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, re 57 Report and Recommendations. Granting in part and Denying in part 54 Motion to Dismiss. George Schaefer, Robert Tellor, Unknown Party, Charlie Glidewell and Greg Rowald dismissed with prejudice Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 06/28/2011. (dkd )
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER denying 43 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud on 11/2/10. (amv)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud; dismissing Robert Burns and Doe#1; denying 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel; finding as moot 6 MOTION for Order. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 8/28/09. (eed)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
