Pakovich v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
| Lisa Pakovich |
| Aetna Life Insurance Company, Broadspire Services, Inc. and Verizon Communications, Inc. |
| 3:2009cv00090 |
| January 30, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office |
| Madison |
| Philip M. Frazier |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER denying 53 Motion for Reconsideration; denying 54 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 8/4/10. (caa)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER denying 32 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 4/22/10. (caa)
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM and ORDER, Granting 33 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Lisa Pakovich. Denying 40 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Verizon LTD Plan. (See order for details.) Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 3/24/10. (acm)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER and MEMORANDUM denying 27 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 11/25/09. (acm)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER and MEMORANDUM Denying 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction under 12(b)(1) on Account of Mootness filed by Verizon Communications, Inc., Broadspire Services, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 7/29/09. (acm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
