Cook v. Illinois Department of Corrections
Betty D. Cook |
Illinois Department of Corrections |
3:2009cv00133 |
February 19, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
Adams |
Philip M. Frazier |
David R Herndon |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
29:621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 119 ORDER denying 118 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 12/3/12. (klh, ) |
Filing 117 ORDER denying 116 Motion motion to amend record on appeal. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 11/2/12. (klh, ) |
Filing 108 ORDER denying 106 Motion for Reconsideration and denying 107 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 5/14/12. (klh, ) |
Filing 105 ORDER denying 104 Motion for reduced fees which the Court construed as a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 4/10/12. (klh, ) |
Filing 101 ORDER granting 100 Motion for Order. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 2/29/12. (klh, ) |
Filing 92 ORDER re 85 Bill of Costs filed by Illinois Department of Corrections. The Court AWARDS IDOC $5,044.00 in costs. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 11/22/11. (klh, ) |
Filing 91 ORDER denying 88 Motion for judgment notwithstanding verdict or in the alternative motion for new trial. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 11/14/11. (klh, ) |
Filing 79 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Illinois Department of Corrections against Betty D. Cook. Approved by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 5/31/11. (skp) |
Filing 48 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion in Limine and granting in part and denying in part 45 Motion in Limine. See Order for details. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 10/21/10. (klh, ) |
Filing 36 ORDER denying 26 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Illinois Department of Corrections. ( Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/7/2010 01:30 PM in East St. Louis Courthouse before Chief Judge David R. Herndon.). Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 08/30/10. (klh, ) |
Filing 25 ORDER GRANTING 24 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Dispositive Motion filed by Illinois Department of Corrections. Illinois Department of Corrections will have up to and including March 26, 2010 in which to file its motion for summary judgment. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 3/19/10. (anj) |
Filing 17 ORDER granting 4 Motion to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 8/20/09. (klh, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cook v. Illinois Department of Corrections | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Betty D. Cook | |
Represented By: | Thomas O. Falb |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Illinois Department of Corrections | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.