Hoang v. Worldwide Asset Purchasing, LLC et al
| Soi Quay Hoang |
| Worldwide Asset Purchasing, LLC and Freedman, Anselmo, Lindberg & Rappe, LLC |
| 3:2009cv00185 |
| March 9, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| O Office |
| St. Clair |
| David R Herndon |
| Donald G. Wilkerson |
| Plaintiff |
| O |
| 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER granting 51 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 2/24/2011. (msdi, )
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER denying 46 MOTION to Set Aside Judgment filed by Edgar E. Lim. Defendants' fee petition is due by 2/22/2011. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 2/15/2011. (msdi, )
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice, DENYING 38 MOTION to Substitute Party filed by Soi Quay Hoang, GRANTING 35 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Freedman, Anselmo, Lindberg & Rappe, LLC, Worldwide Asset Purchasing, LLC. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 12/27/10. (anj)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER granting 30 Motion delay entry of judgment of dismissal; granting 31 Motion To Delay Entry Of Judgment. Responses due 5/17/10. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 3/17/10. (anj)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER denying 14 Motion to Dismiss and Request for Sanctions. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 11/2/09. (anj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
