Birdo v. Centralia Police Department et al
| Tanaka Birdo |
| Centralia Police Department, Sergeant Courtical, Michael Peebles, James Ramsey and Jason Smith |
| 3:2009cv00192 |
| March 11, 2009 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Marion |
| G. Patrick Murphy |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER DENYING 43 MOTION for Reconsideration of 6 Order denying appointment of counsel filed by Plaintiff Tanaka Birdo. This matter remains set for final pretrial conference on 7/26/2010 at 8:00 a.m. in the East St. Louis Courthouse. Unless counsel enters his/her appearance on Plaintiff's behalf before the hearing, Plaintiff SHALL attend the final pretrial conference in person. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 7/20/2010. (ssd)
|
Filing
41
ORDER GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 17 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by James Ramsey, Michael Peebles, Sergeant Courtial, Centralia Police Department. Plaintiff's claims against Centralia Police Department, Tami Courtial, and Jason Smith are DISMISSED with prejudice; Centralia Police Department, Sergeant Courtial, and Jason Smith are terminated as parties. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 2/25/2010. (ssd)
|
Filing
6
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson; Denying 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 6/26/2009. (jwt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.