Birdo v. Centralia Police Department et al
Plaintiff: Tanaka Birdo
Defendant: Centralia Police Department, Sergeant Courtical, Michael Peebles, James Ramsey and Jason Smith
Case Number: 3:2009cv00192
Filed: March 11, 2009
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: Marion
Presiding Judge: G. Patrick Murphy
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER DENYING 43 MOTION for Reconsideration of 6 Order denying appointment of counsel filed by Plaintiff Tanaka Birdo. This matter remains set for final pretrial conference on 7/26/2010 at 8:00 a.m. in the East St. Louis Courthouse. Unless counsel enters his/her appearance on Plaintiff's behalf before the hearing, Plaintiff SHALL attend the final pretrial conference in person. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 7/20/2010. (ssd)
February 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 17 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by James Ramsey, Michael Peebles, Sergeant Courtial, Centralia Police Department. Plaintiff's claims against Centralia Police Department, Tami Courtial, and Jason Smith are DISMISSED with prejudice; Centralia Police Department, Sergeant Courtial, and Jason Smith are terminated as parties. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 2/25/2010. (ssd)
June 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson; Denying 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 6/26/2009. (jwt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Birdo v. Centralia Police Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tanaka Birdo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Centralia Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sergeant Courtical
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Peebles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Ramsey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jason Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?