Perry v. Monroe et al
| Sidney Perry |
| Tina Monroe, C Bradley, C/O Moore, Lt Dilday, M Sauerwein and Unknown Party |
| 3:2009cv00239 |
| March 27, 2009 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Randolph |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
ORDER granting 59 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting in part Report and Recommendations 74 . Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 7/22/2011. (ktc)
|
Filing
42
ORDER finding as moot 33 Motion to Appoint Counsel; granting 36 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply (Responses due by 10/18/2010); granting 41 Motion to Strike 32 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary or Permanent Injunction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 7/30/2010. (hbs)
|
Filing
19
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL. Attorney Peter C. Bastianen is appointed to represent Plaintiff in the action. Granting 18 MOTION for Reconsideration re 11 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel filed by Sidney Perry. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 5/24/2010. (hbs)
|
Filing
10
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson; dismissing M Sauerwein; granting 2 MOTION for leave to file complaint in handwritten form; granting 7 MOTION to Amend/Correct; denying 6 MOTION for restraining order. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 12/21/09. (eed)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.