Giles v. Continental Casualty Company et al
Richard Giles |
Continental Casualty Company, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. and Phillips Service Corporation |
3:2009cv00368 |
May 13, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
East St. Louis Office |
St. Clair |
Philip M. Frazier |
J. Phil Gilbert |
Plaintiff |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 CLERK'S JUDGMENT (NJR/dka) dismissing case without prejudice.Approved by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 2/23/2010. (dka, ) |
Filing 39 MEMORANDUM, ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; granting 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Robert Barrack; granting 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Center for Advanced Medicine, Washington University Medical Center. The Court dismisses Giles' claims against Barrack and WUMC (Count II) without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction. The Court denies as moot 10 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Robert Barrack and denies as moot 15 MOTION to Dismis s filed by Center for Advanced Medicine, Washington University Medical Center based on the statue of limitations. Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly at close of case. Giles to show cause why his claims against Continental and Hartford (Count 1) should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to timely effect service. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 2/5/2010. (dka, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.