Custom Foam Works, Inc. v. Hydrotech Systems, LTD et al
Custom Foam Works, Inc. |
Hydrotech Systems, LTD and Aquatic Development Group |
3:2009cv00710 |
September 10, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
East St. Louis Office |
Madison |
Clifford J. Proud |
Michael J. Reagan |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 97 ORDER granting 88 Motion to Strike and advising the parties that the trial date may be briefly delayed. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 6/1/11. (caa) |
Filing 85 ORDER denying 57 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 3/23/11. (caa) |
Filing 81 ORDER denying 69 Motion to strike and denying as moot 71 Motion to shorten time to respond to motion to strike. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 3/10/11. (caa) |
Filing 61 ORDER overruling in part and sustains in part 54 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 1/14/11. (amv) |
Filing 52 ORDER denying 41 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 11/09/10. (dkd ) |
Filing 51 ORDER denying 45 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 10/29/10. (caa) |
Filing 43 ORDER granting 29 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud on 8/25/10. (amv) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.