Wells v. Ryker et al
Plaintiff: Crandall Wells
Defendant: Lee Ryker, James Fenoglio and Laurie Cunningham
Case Number: 3:2009cv00828
Filed: October 7, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Lawrence
Presiding Judge: J. Phil Gilbert
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 51 CLERK'S JUDGMENT (NJR/jdh) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff Crandall Wells claims in this suit against defendants Lee Ryker and Laurie Cunningham and plaintiff Crandall Wellsclaim against defendant James Fenoglio for a Fourteenth Amendment due process violation are dismissed with prejudice; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor ofdefendant James Fenoglio and against plaintiff Crandall Wells on Wells Eighth Amendment claim. in favor of James Fenoglio against Crandall Wells.Approved by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 8/23/2012. (jdh)
October 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER GRANTING 19 Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel and 20 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Appointment of Counsel. Attorney John Pawlowski is hereby appointed to represent Plaintiff in this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 10/5/10. (alg)
September 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 26 PROTECTIVE ORDER, GRANTING 21 MOTION for Protective Order (HIPAA)filed by James Fenoglio. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 9/14/10. (alg)
April 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson; Dismissing Plaintiff's Due Process claims against Defendant Fenoglio pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915A; and Dismissing all of Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Ryker and Cunni ngham pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915A; Dismissals count as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(g) Defendants Laurie Cunningham and Lee Ryker are dismissed as defendants in this case; and Denying 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 4/26/2010. (jwt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wells v. Ryker et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Crandall Wells
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lee Ryker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Fenoglio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Laurie Cunningham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?