Belleville et al v. Cottrell, Inc. et al
| Chester Belleville and Gwendlynn Belleville |
| Cottrell, Inc., Auto Handling Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc., Cassens Corporation, Cassens & Sons, Inc., Roger Owens, American Zurich Insurance Company and Toyota Logistics Services, Inc. |
| 3:2009cv00962 |
| November 17, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Madison |
| J. Phil Gilbert |
| Clifford J. Proud |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying Belleville's Motion to remand 38 but remanding case to Madison County, Illinois, for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 3/24/2010. (dka, )
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER granting 47 Motion to Stay Discovery As To AZIC. Discovery shall proceed relative to all other parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud on 2/2/10. (amv)
|
|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 31 . Cassens & Sons, Inc. and Cassens Corporation dismissed without prejudice. Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly at close of case. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 12/16/09. (dka, )
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER denying 7 Motion for More Definite Statement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud on 12/2/09. (amv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
