Morris v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
| Dana Morris |
| AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and Megan DeFrain |
| 3:2010cv00056 |
| January 25, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| St. Clair |
| Philip M. Frazier |
| David R. Herndon |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing case with prejudice. Approved by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 11/15/11. (skp)
|
|
Filing
32
60 DAY ORDER advising that case has settled. Responses due by 11/17/2011. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 9/15/11. (skp)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER DIRECTING defendant AstraZeneca to file its Rule 7.1 corporate disclosure statement within 10 days. However, as this date would fall on a holiday, Defendant shall file said statement no later than 11/29/10. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 11/15/10. (seg)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER GRANTING 2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and directing Plaintiff to make monthly payments, as further instructed in text of Order; DENYING 3 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel; and DENYING 4 Plaintiff's Motion for Service of Process at Government's Expense. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 4/26/10. (seg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
