Jellis v. Veath et al
Plaintiff: Jerry Jellis
Defendant: Lt Veath, John Aubuchon, Donald Hulick and Michael Randle
Case Number: 3:2010cv00091
Filed: February 4, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Randolph
Presiding Judge: G. Patrick Murphy
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 125 ORDER GRANTING 117 Motion for Attorney Fees; DENYING 122 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 4/18/13. (sgp)
January 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER DENYING 73 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 1/29/13. (sgp)
October 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER granting 58 Motion to Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of the Complaint for Failure to State a Claim. Count I remains. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 10/25/2012. (hbs)
June 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson. The Clerk of Court shall prepare for Defendants VEATH and AUBUCHON: (1) Form 5 (Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons), and (2) Form 6 (Waiver of Service of Summons). Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 6/30/2011. (tjk)
January 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b), Plaintiff-Appellant Jerry Jellis is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $1.61 on his appeal in forma pauperis from the Court's judgment entered August 31, 2010, dismissing this case; see attached order for further details. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 1/15/2011. (jhs)
August 31, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER dismissing case pursuant to 28 USC 1915A; this dismissal counts as a strike. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 8/31/10. (eed)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jellis v. Veath et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jerry Jellis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lt Veath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Aubuchon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donald Hulick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Randle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?