Johnson v. Randle et al
Plaintiff: |
Larry M Johnson |
Defendant: |
Michael Randle, Suzann Griswold, Donald Gatez, Loyd Hanna, Jim Winters, Mike Lillard and Ronald Brockhouse |
Case Number: |
3:2010cv00135 |
Filed: |
February 19, 2010 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Office: |
East St. Louis Office |
County: |
Randolph |
Presiding Judge: |
Michael J. Reagan |
Nature of Suit: |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
October 15, 2013 |
Filing
252
ORDER denying as moot 227 Motion for New Trial; denying 231 Motion for New Trial; granting 245 Motion to Supplement; denying 251 Motion for Status. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 10/15/13. (amv)
|
March 30, 2013 |
Filing
223
JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 3/30/13. (amv)
|
May 31, 2012 |
Filing
154
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants motion for summary judgment 131 . Additionally, the Court GRANTS Johnsons Motion for Leave to Amend 126 , DENIES Johnsons Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 145 , and DENIES Johnsons motion for summary judgment (contained within Doc. 136 . Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 5/31/12. (amv)
|
December 29, 2011 |
Filing
142
ORDER denying 125 Motion to Compel; denying 125 Motion for Sanctions; denying 129 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; denying 140 Motion to Strike. Defendants shall file their reply to plaintiff's response to 131 MOTION for Summary Judgment on or before January 18, 2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 12/28/11. (amv)
|
September 28, 2011 |
Filing
119
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 111 Motion to Compel. All documents that Defendants are Ordered to produce herein SHALL be provided to Plaintiff Johnson on or before October 11, 2011. See attached Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 9/28/2011. (ehb) THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
July 20, 2011 |
Filing
102
ORDER re 89 APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court filed by Larry M Johnson: For the reasons thoroughly explained in the attached Order, the undersigned District Judge rejects Plaintiff's appeal (Doc. 89), overruling each of Plaintiff's objections to and AFFIRMING Magistrate Judge Williams' challenged discovery rulings. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 7/20/11. (soh )
|
May 13, 2011 |
Filing
68
ORDER: granting 48 Motion to Withdraw; granting in part and denying in part 51 , 52 and 58 Motions for Order; granting 59 Motion for Leave to File; denying 63 Motion for Hearing; denying as MOOT 64 Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad tes tificandum; taking under advisement 65 Motion for Order to Compel; denying 67 Motion to Submit Exhibits. See attached Order for details. Defendants must comply with the terms of this Order on or before Friday, June 10, 2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 5/13/2011. (ehb)
|
December 1, 2010 |
Filing
16
ORDER denying without prejudice 14 Motion to Appoint Counsel and 15 Motion for Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 12/1/2010. (hbs)
|
August 31, 2010 |
Filing
5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson; granting 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; finding moot 4 MOTION for Service of Process at Government Expense. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 8/31/10. (eed)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?