Brown v. Ryker et al
| James Brown |
| Lee Ryker, Donald Gaetz and Christine Boyd |
| 3:2010cv00397 |
| May 28, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Lawrence |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
122
JUDGMENT in favor of Christine Boyd, Donald Gaetz, Lee Ryker against James Brown. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 3/13/13. (amv)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER denying 81 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 10/9/12. (amv)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER, DENYING 33 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Donald Gaetz, Christine Boyd, Lee Ryker. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 06/12/2012. (mmr)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER denying 35 Motion to Certify Class; Motion to Appoint Counsel; granting 36 Motion to Compel. Plaintiff shall respond to interrogatories and request to produce by 2/24/12. Granting 37 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 33 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 3/30/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 2/17/12. (amv)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams. Clerk shall prepare a Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons as to Defendants Ryker, Gaetz and Boyd. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 1/20/2011. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
