National Railway Equipment Co. v. Miba Bearings U.S.,LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Illinois Southern District National Railway Equipment Co. v. Miba Bearings U.S.,LLC

National Railway Equipment Co. v. Miba Bearings U.S.,LLC

Plaintiff:	National Railway Equipment Co.
Defendant:	Miba Bearings U.S.,LLC
Case Number:	3:2010cv00644
Filed:	August 20, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office:	East St. Louis Office
County:	Jefferson
Presiding Judge:	Philip M. Frazier
Presiding Judge:	Michael J. Reagan
Nature of Suit:	Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 15, 2010	Filing 12 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: As explained in the attached Order, the Court DISMISSES this action under Fed. Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 10/15/10. (soh )
September 21, 2010	Filing 10 ORDER DISMISSING ORIGINAL COMPLAINT and DENYING AS MOOT 8 Motion to Dismiss filed by Miba Bearings: As explained in the attached written Order, on threshold jurisdictional review, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's original complaint (which lacks the information needed for the undersigned Judge to verify that subject matter jurisdiction lies in this Court), SETS an October 14, 2010 DEADLINE for Plaintiff to file a First Amended Complaint (supplying the jurisdictional facts), and DENIES AS MOOT Defendant Miba's dismissal motion directed at the now dismissed original complaint. (First Amended Complaint due by 10/14/2010.)Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 9/21/2010. (soh )

Date Filed

Document Text

October 15, 2010

Filing 12 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: As explained in the attached Order, the Court DISMISSES this action under Fed. Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 10/15/10. (soh )

September 21, 2010

Filing 10 ORDER DISMISSING ORIGINAL COMPLAINT and DENYING AS MOOT 8 Motion to Dismiss filed by Miba Bearings: As explained in the attached written Order, on threshold jurisdictional review, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's original complaint (which lacks the information needed for the undersigned Judge to verify that subject matter jurisdiction lies in this Court), SETS an October 14, 2010 DEADLINE for Plaintiff to file a First Amended Complaint (supplying the jurisdictional facts), and DENIES AS MOOT Defendant Miba's dismissal motion directed at the now dismissed original complaint. (First Amended Complaint due by 10/14/2010.)Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 9/21/2010. (soh )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: National Railway Equipment Co. v. Miba Bearings U.S.,LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: National Railway Equipment Co.
Represented By:	Henry P. Villani
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Miba Bearings U.S.,LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?