The Burlington Insurance Company
| The Burlington Insurance Company |
| Madison Garrett, Sr., Medora Garrett, Phillips-Garrett Inc. and Amos Blanchard |
| 3:2010cv00817 |
| October 18, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| St. Clair |
| David R. Herndon |
| Clifford J. Proud |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of The Burlington Insurance Company against Amos Blanchard. Approved by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 4/28/11. (skp)
|
|
Filing
34
CLERK'S JUDGMENT - there being no just reason for delay - Judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff and against Madison Garrett, Sr., Medora Garrett, Phillips-Garrett Inc., d/b/a Garrett's Pink Slip Exotic Bar. Approved by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 4/18/11. (skp)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER acknowledging 31 stipulation filed by plaintiff and defendants (excluding Amos Blanchard) and directing the Clerk to enter judgment pursuant to FRCP 54(g) and denying as moot 30 motion for leave to file a response to show cause order and answer out of time filed by defendants (excluding Amos Blanchard). Plaintiff's show cause response is due by 4/20/2011 or the Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 4/13/2011. (msdi, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
