Davis v. Wahl et al
Joseph Davis |
Nurse Wahl, Dr Rector, Fenton, Dr Shepard, Randy Davis, Christine Brown, Sherry Benton, K Deen and T Kisro |
3:2010cv00971 |
December 1, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
East St. Louis Office |
Perry |
J. Phil Gilbert |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 128 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Denying 125 MOTION for Relief from Judgment for Errors Upon the Face of the Record filed by Joseph Davis. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 2/26/2014. (jdh) |
Filing 122 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Granting 111 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Dr Wahl, the court dismisses Wahl from this case, strikes Davis's sur-reply (doc 117 ) and directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 11/20/2013. (jdh) |
Filing 99 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 98 and 64 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Dr Shepherd. Dr. Shepherd dismissed from this case. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 1/2/2013. (dka, ) |
Filing 75 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 72 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 7/23/2012. (dka, ) |
Filing 63 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 51 ; granting 42 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Dr Rector. Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly at close of case. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 3/22/2012. (dka, ) |
Filing 16 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier, Philip M. Frazier added. K Deen, Fenton, S Godinez, T Kisro, Wexford Health Care Services, Rod Blagojevich and Christine Brown terminated. DENYING 14 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Jo seph Davis. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that COUNT TWO fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and thus is DISMISSED without prejudice. Defendants FENTON, BROWN, and WEXFORD HEALTH CARE SERVICES are DISMISSED from this action without preju dice. Defendants DEEN, KISRO, GODINEZ, and BLAGOJEVICH are DISMISSED from this action with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall prepare for Defendants WAHL, RECTOR and SHEPARD (1) Form 5 (Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons), and (2) Form 6 (Waiver of Service of Summons). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 7/26/2011. (beb) |
Filing 13 ORDER STRIKING Plaintiffs (First) Amended Complaint (Doc. 7). Should he wish to proceed with this case, Plaintiff shall file his Second Amended Complaint, naming the individual Defendants directly responsible for the alleged deprivations of his cons titutional rights, within 35 days of the entry of this order (on or before August 18, 2011). The Second Amended Complaint must stand on its own, and Plaintiff must re-file any exhibits he wishes the Court to consider along with the Second Amended Com plaint. Failure to file a Second Amended Complaint may result in dismissal of this case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk shall STRIKE FROM THE RECORD Plaintiffs (First) Amended Complaint (Doc. 7). In addition, because muc h of pages 2-6 of the original complaint (Doc. 1) are illegible in their current electronic form, the Clerk is further DIRECTED to re-scan pages 2-6 of Doc.1, and substitute/replace the existing pages 2-6 with the newly re-scanned pages. Service on the Defendants shall not be commenced until after the Court reviews the Second Amended Complaint. ( Amended Pleadings due by 8/18/2011.) Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 7/14/2011. (beb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.