Slater
| Richard E Slater |
| James Watkins, George Johnson, Billy Vaughn, Brad McCarthy, Marilyn Melton, Rhonna Medlin, Marvin F. Powers, Stacey Williamson, Terry Caliper, Krissy Watson, Connie Kerr, Shelby Dunn, Kathie Butler and Laura Qualls |
| 3:2010cv00973 |
| December 2, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Alexander |
| G. Patrick Murphy |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
ORDER granting 61 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 3/28/2013. (ktc)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER granting 42 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant Marvin F. Powers is dismissed from this action. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 9/14/2012. (ktc)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson. The Clerk of Court shall prepare for Defendants WATKINS, JOHNSON, VAUGHN, and POWERS (1) Form 5 (Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons), and (2) Form 6 (Waiver of Service of Summons). Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 9/13/2011. (beb)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER: Plaintiff Richard Slater is hereby advised that the Court is contemplating severance of his claims in this case; see attached order for specifics. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 5/27/2011. (jhs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
