August 1, 2013 |
Filing
126
ORDER DENYING 116 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Campbell, Howard, John Cox, Charles Bates, Norman Suits. Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/16/2013 02:00 PM in East St. Louis Courthouse before Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson, Jury Trial set for 10/28/2013 09:00 AM in East St. Louis Courthouse before Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 8/1/13. (sgp)
|
January 10, 2013 |
Filing
113
ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 76 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 1/10/13. (sgp)
|
June 25, 2012 |
Filing
100
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL. Attorney George O. Suggs appointed to represent Jamal Shehadeh. Granting 99 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Adam Brooke Rucker terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 6/25/2012. (hbs)
|
June 11, 2012 |
Filing
96
ORDER granting 81 MOTION to Appoint Counsel and 85 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Jamal Shehadeh. Attorney Adam Brooke Rucker for Jamal Shehadeh appointed. Pending motions filed by Plaintiff pro se are denied without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 6/11/2012. (hbs)
|
April 25, 2012 |
Filing
83
ORDER finding as moot 73 Motion to Compel; denying 74 Motion for Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 4/25/2012. (hbs)
|
February 10, 2012 |
Filing
65
ORDER denying 61 Motion to Compel; denying 61 Motion for Sanctions; denying 64 Motion for Hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 2/10/2012. (hbs)
|
September 14, 2011 |
Filing
25
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson, GRANTING 24 Partial MOTION to Dismiss filed by Jamal Shehadeh. COUNT 1 B and COUNT 4 are DISMISSED without prejudice. DEFENDANTS ALLSTAD, DAVID, and FELKER are DISMISSED from this acti on without prejudice as they are not named in the Second Amended Complaint. Donald G. Wilkerson added. Felker, Allstad and David terminated. As to COUNT 2, the Clerk of Court shall prepare for Defendants BATES, CAMPBELL, COX, HOWARD, and SUITS (1) Form 5 (Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons), and (2) Form 6 (Waiver of Service of Summons). The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail these forms, a copy of the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 23), the Memorandum and Order of July 14, 2011 (Doc. 15), and this Memorandum and Order to each Defendants place of employment as identified by Plaintiff. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 9/14/2011. (beb)
|
July 14, 2011 |
Filing
15
ORDER that COUNT THREE fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and thus is DISMISSED with prejudice. Defendants LUCE, WIGGS, BENTON, QUINN and TAYLOR are DISMISSED from this action with prejudice. As to COUNT ONE, Plaintiff may proce ed on his claim in subpart B that the cold temperatures in Building 19 violated his constitutional rights, against Defendants Campbell, Howard, Felker, Suits, Allstad, David, Bates, and the 13 John Doe Defendants. However, all other portions of Count One are DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, should Plaintiff wish to proceed on his claims in COUNT TWO and COUNT FOUR, Plaintiff shall file his Second Amended Complaint, naming the individual Defendants directly responsible for th e alleged deprivations in Count Two and Count Four, within 35 days of the entry of this order. Plaintiff is ADVISED that the Second Amended Complaint shall contain ONLY the claims designated in this Order as Count One B, Count Two and Count Four, an d shall name ONLY those Defendants directly and personally responsible for the allegedly unconstitutional acts. Should the Second Amended Complaint not conform to these requirements, it shall be stricken and the entire case may be dismissed. Failure to file an amended complaint may result in dismissal of this case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Service on the remaining Defendants shall not be commenced until after the Court reviews the Second Amended Complaint. Furthermore , upon review of the Second Amended Complaint, if the Court determines that the claims in Counts One and Two are not sufficiently related to the claim in Count Four, the Court may sever Count Four into a new case and assess a new filing fee. ( Amended Pleadings due by 8/18/2011.) Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 7/14/2011. (beb)
|