Meridian Electric Company, Inc. v. Energizer Holdings, Inc.
| Meridian Electric Company, Inc. |
| Energizer Holdings, Inc. |
| 3:2011cv00035 |
| January 12, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| David R. Herndon |
| Donald G. Wilkerson |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER granting in part and denying in part defendant's 7 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support Thereof, allowing plaintiff leave to amend to plead sufficient facts. Plaintiff's Amended Pleadings are due by 8/5/2011. Defendant� 39;s 28 MOTION to Stay Discovery pending a decision on the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 7) is granted until the Court determines whether plaintiff's amended complaint satisfies Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b). The Court defers ruling on the 29 MOTION to Transfer Case until that decision is made. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 7/12/2011. (msdi, )
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER granting 25 motion to intervene filed by the United States of America and certifying to the Attorney General of the United States that a statute has been questioned. The United States has up to and including May 25, 2011, to file a brief. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 4/25/2011. (msdi, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
