Laso v. Kimble et al
Plaintiff: Eugenio Laso
Defendant: Dentist Kimble, Unknown Party and Wexford Corporation
Case Number: 3:2011cv00379
Filed: May 6, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Brown
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Reagan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER granting 46 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Dismissing Case: For the reasons explained in the attached Order, the Court GRANTS Defendant Veath's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. 46). Plaintiff's claims against De fendant Veath are DISMISSED with prejudice. No other claims remain, so the Clerk is DIRECTED to enter final judgment against Plaintiff Laso and in favor of all Defendants, after which the case shall be closed. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 3/9/13. (soh )
October 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams. Because counsel was appointed for a limited purpose and the purpose has been fulfilled, Attorney Sherman may file a motion to withdraw his representation of Plaintiff within 7 days of the date of this order. If a motion to withdraw is not filed, Attorney Sherman shall continue to represent Plaintiff in this case. Defendant Veath is ORDERED to timely file an appropriate responsive pleading to the complaint and shall not waive filing a reply pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g).Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 10/17/2012. (tjk)
May 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER appointing Attorney Steven M. Sherman for Eugenio Laso for the limited purpose of identifying the Unknown Lieutenant of the Transfer Bus. The Second Amended Complaint SHALL BE FILED WITHIN THREE MONTHS of the entry of this order. Failure to i dentify the Unknown Lieutenant of the Transfer Bus and file a Second Amended Complaint will result in the dismissal of the case. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that COUNTS 1 and 2 of Plaintiffs complaint fail to state a constitutional claim upon which relief m ay be granted, and thus are DISMISSED without prejudice. Defendant KIMBLE, and Defendants UNKNOWN PARTY DOCTORS 1 and 2 are DISMISSED without prejudice. Dentist Kimble and Unknown Party 1 terminated. (Action due by 8/2/2012). Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 5/2/2012. (tjk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Laso v. Kimble et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dentist Kimble
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Party
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wexford Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eugenio Laso
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?