Williams v. Benton et al
| Travis Williams |
| Brad J Robert, Robert Hilliard, Dewayne Edler, Mark Beckman, Venerio Santos, Gina Feazel, Unknown Party, Lynette Colvis, Kim Marlow and Sherry Benton |
| 3:2011cv00566 |
| June 28, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Marion |
| G. Patrick Murphy |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER: This matter came before the Court for preliminary review of the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. COUNTS 1(a), 1(b), 1(c), 1(d), and 1(e) fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and thus are DISMISSED with prejudic e. COUNTS 2 and 3 also fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and are DISMISSED with prejudice. COUNT 4 is DISMISSED with prejudice. Defendant JOHN DOE is DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. Plaintiff is advised that thi s dismissal shall count as one of his allotted strikes under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff's obligation to pay the filing fee for this action was incurred at the time the action was filed, thus the filing fee of $350 remains due and payable. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case on the Court's docket. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 8/16/2012. (mab)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
