Connelly v. Cross
Defendant: J Cross
Petitioner: James Connelly
Case Number: 3:2011cv00663
Filed: August 2, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Bond
Presiding Judge: David R. Herndon
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to pay the required filing fee, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Petitioner is reminded that, despite the dismissal of this action, he is still obligated to pay the district court and appellate court filing fees as previously ordered. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 2/29/2012. (tjk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Connelly v. Cross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James Connelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J Cross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?