Birk v. Stark

Birk v. Stark

Plaintiff:	Teresa Birk
Defendant:	Gary Stark
Case Number:	3:2011cv01007
Filed:	November 16, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office:	East St. Louis Office
County:	Union
Presiding Judge:	Philip M. Frazier
Presiding Judge:	Michael J. Reagan
Nature of Suit:	Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 2, 2013	Filing 45 ORDER denying 34 Motion for Summary Judgment: For the reasons thoroughly delineated in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 34). Trial will proceed on July 29, 2013, as scheduled. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 5/2/13. (soh)
January 6, 2012	Filing 11 ORDER ON THRESHOLD JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW: As fully explained in the attached Order, the complaint currently on file before the Court does not properly plead all elements of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332. Accordingly, the Court DENIES f or lack of subject matter jurisdiction (without prejudice to the motion later being re-filed) 10 Plaintiff's motion for Default Judgment as to Gary Stark. The Court DIRECTS Plaintiff's counsel to file a First Amended Complaint on or before January 31, 2012. See Order for additional details.(Amended Complaint due by 1/31/2012.) Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 1/6/2012. (soh )

Date Filed

Document Text

May 2, 2013

Filing 45 ORDER denying 34 Motion for Summary Judgment: For the reasons thoroughly delineated in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 34). Trial will proceed on July 29, 2013, as scheduled. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 5/2/13. (soh)

January 6, 2012

Filing 11 ORDER ON THRESHOLD JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW: As fully explained in the attached Order, the complaint currently on file before the Court does not properly plead all elements of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332. Accordingly, the Court DENIES f or lack of subject matter jurisdiction (without prejudice to the motion later being re-filed) 10 Plaintiff's motion for Default Judgment as to Gary Stark. The Court DIRECTS Plaintiff's counsel to file a First Amended Complaint on or before January 31, 2012. See Order for additional details.(Amended Complaint due by 1/31/2012.) Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 1/6/2012. (soh )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Birk v. Stark
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Teresa Birk
Represented By:	John D. Alleman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Gary Stark
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?