Dugger et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
| April Danielle Dugger, Sarah Annette Reves Smith and Claudia Marie Thomas |
| Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc and Bayer Pharma AG |
| 3:2011cv12436 |
| August 1, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Philip M. Frazier |
| David R. Herndon |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
CLERK'S JUDGMENT Dismissing Case with Prejudice Approved by Judge David R. Herndon on 2/4/2016. (cds)
|
|
Filing
17
CLERK'S JUDGMENT Closing Case and Dismissing with Prejudice approved by Judge David R. Herndon on 01/05/2016. (cjo)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER granting 10 Motion to Dismiss WITH prejudice as to the claims of plaintiff April Dugger for failure to comply with PFS requirements. The Court instructs the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment reflecting the same at the close of the case. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 7/17/2013. (dsw)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER, GRANTING 7 MOTION to Dismiss. The claims of Plaintiff April Dugger are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to comply with Plaintiff Fact Sheet Requirements. Plaintiff April Danielle Dugger terminated.Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 3/11/2013. (dsw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
