Redick et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
| Michelle Cranford, Adria Redick, Amanda Montgomery, Anne Covey and Carrie Hamilton |
| Bayer Corporation, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare, LLC, Barr Laboratories, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. |
| 3:2011cv13372 |
| November 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Philip M. Frazier |
| David R. Herndon |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
CLERK'S JUDGMENT Dismissing Case with Prejudice. Approved by Judge David R. Herndon on 12/1/2014.(jlrr )
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER granting 8 Motion to Dismiss. The claims of plaintiff Carrie Hamilton are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to comply with Plaintiff Fact Sheet Requirements. FURTHER, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to ENTER JUDGMENT reflecting the same AT THE CLOSE OF THE CASE. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 5/20/2013. (dsw)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER granting 6 Motion to Dismiss as to plaintiff Carrie Hamilton ONLY. The claims of plaintiff Carrie Hamilton are dismissed WITHOUT prejudice for failure to comply with Plaintiff Fact Sheet Requirements. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 9/20/2012. (dsw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
