Hamilton et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
| Walter Hamilton and Dianna Hamilton |
| Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Healthcare AG and Bayer AG |
| 3:2011cv13465 |
| December 9, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Philip M. Frazier |
| David R. Herndon |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
117
MEMORANDUM to Transferee Court from Transferor Court containing case-specific details to help aid in transfer. (klh)
|
|
Filing
113
PROTECTIVE ORDER governing production re Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 10/27/2018. (ceh)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER DENYING 36 MOTION to Strike the Untimely Supplemental Report of Dr. Henry Rinder filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and GRANTING 50 MOTION to Compel the Additional Depositions of Plaintffs' ; Experts Dr. Henry Rinder and Dr. Mitchell Botney filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Each deposition shall last no longer than twenty minutes per side and shall be limited to the scope of the supplemental reports. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 9/13/2017. (ceh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
