Harmon v. Jordan et al
Rickey Harmon |
Cynthia Jordan, Sarah Farris and Olu Obadina |
3:2012cv00021 |
January 9, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
East St. Louis Office |
Lawrence |
Michael J. Reagan |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 125 JUDGMENT in favor of Nurse Gale, Nurse Joyce, Nurse Melvin, Cynthia Jordan, Sarah Farris against Rickey Harmon. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 7/21/15. (amv) |
Filing 84 ORDER. For the reasons explained in the attached Memorandum & Order, the summary judgment motion filed by Defendants Gale, Lucas, Ferris and Melvin (Doc. 71 ) is GRANTED, and Defendant Jordan's summary judgment motion (Doc. 74 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The claims against Defendant Jordan re: deliberate indifference to Plaintiff's gastrointestinal problems shall proceed to trial. See attached for details.Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 9/11/2014. (jls) |
Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams. The Clerk of Court shall prepare for Defendants Jordan, Obadina, Farris, Joyce, Gale, and Melvin: (1) Form 5 (Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons), and (2) Form 6 (Waiver of Service of Summons). Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 8/9/2012. (tjk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.