Snodgrass v. USA
| Steven Snodgrass |
| USA |
| 3:2012cv00050 |
| January 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Williamson |
| J. Phil Gilbert |
| Motions to Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court DENIES Snodgrass motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis (Doc. 57). The Court GRANTS the motion (Doc. 58) and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to send Snodgrass a copy of the docket sheet in this § 2255 case. The Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to send a copy of this order to the Court of Appeals in connection with Snodgrass May 29, 2015, notice of appeal (Doc. 56). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 6/2/2015. (jdh)
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court DISMISSES Snodgrass motion (Doc. 53 ) for lack of jurisdiction. The Court further DISMISSES Snodgrass motion for the Court to order the Government to disclose to him certain documents relating to his criminal case (Doc. 54 ) for lack of jurisdiction for the same reasons it denied a similar motion in an April 28, 2015, order (Doc. 52 ). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 5/15/2015. (jdh)
|
|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, dismissing 50 MOTION for Prior Record of the Defendant and Incorporated Memoranda in Support filed by Steven Snodgrass for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 4/28/2015. (jdh)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER, The Court GRANTS the Governments motion to dismiss (Doc. 49 ) and DISMISSES Snodgrass motion (Doc. 48 ) for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 4/21/2015. (jdh)
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, denying 44 MOTION for Extension of Time to File filed by Steven Snodgrass. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 2/5/2015. (jdh)
|
|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court finds that the petitioner has not made the required showing and, accordingly, DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. The Court further DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to send a copy of this order to the Court of Appeals in connection with Appeal No. 14-1210. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 1/31/2014. (jdh)
|
|
Filing
23
JUDGMENT. Approved by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 11/20/2013. (jdh)
|
|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The Court finds Ground 2 does not justify Sec. 2255 relief. The Court Orders the Government to file a response to Grounds 1 and 3 of the petitioner's Sec. 2255 motion within Thirty Days of the date this order is entered. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 3/28/13. (bkl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Snodgrass v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Steven Snodgrass | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | George A. Norwood |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
